Voxel-Based Monte Carlo Estimation of Absorbed and Effective Radiation
Voxel-Based
Monte Carlo Estimation of Absorbed and Effective Radiation Dose in Lung Tissue
from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT Using OpenGATE
Farag Mahmoud Ali 1 Aya Alhadi Ermeelah2
farag.mahmoud@sabu.edu.ly 1 aya.armeelah@sabu.edu.ly2
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0358-1194 1 https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2125-36792
Faculty of Pharmacy Sabratha
University1 Faculty
of Science Sabratha University2
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19801043
Abstract:
Background: Working out precise, truly
patient-specific radiation doses from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans remains a genuine
headache in practice. Anatomy differs so much between individuals, and the
standard reference phantoms we often turn to simply don't account for that level
of variation very well. In our case, we wanted to try something more grounded:
a voxel-by-voxel Monte Carlo approach built in OpenGATE, drawing directly from
real clinical CT data to estimate doses for a routine 370 MBq ¹⁸F-FDG injection
in a thoracic region that actually reflects a patient's body.
Methods: We pulled an anonymized chest CT
from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), specifically the NSCLC-Radiomics set
[24]. Converting it to a voxel phantom involved segmenting into six tissue
classes (air, lung, fat, soft tissue, cartilage, bone) using Hounsfield Unit
cutoffs following Schneider's method [27].
To define the source, we kept the
¹⁸F-FDG activity uniform but restricted it inside an eroded body outline this
helped cut down on positron escape artifacts that can mess up boundary results.
Simulations used one million primary positrons with the QGSP_BIC_EMY physics
list. Scaling by 33,208 brought it up to clinical activity levels, and we
layered on a rough correction factor of ~250× to roughly compensate for photon
escape and the non-uniform uptake seen in real scans.
We then extracted organ absorbed
doses, computed effective dose via ICRP 103 weighting factors [18], and looked
at dose-volume histograms (DVHs) to assess how evenly (or unevenly) the dose
spreads through tissues.
Results: With corrections applied,
effective dose landed at 5.85 mSv comfortably inside
the 5–9 mSv ballpark from ICRP Publication 128 for standard ¹⁸F-FDG exams [21].
It felt reassuring to see it align so closely. Tissue-specific means came out
to about 22.58 mGy in lung, 24.97 mGy in soft tissue, and 18.39 mGy in compact
bone. For the lung DVH, D95 was 3.45 mGy and V20 reached 24.9%, suggesting
reasonable coverage but with the kind of heterogeneity you'd naturally expect
in real anatomy.
The erosion step worked well only 1.12% of dose leaked outside the body afterward.
Statistical uncertainties stayed below 1% across major tissues, which gave us
confidence in the numbers.
Conclusion: In summary, this work presents a
reproducible Monte Carlo workflow for ¹⁸F-FDG PET dosimetry using Open GATE and
real patient CT data. The calculated effective dose of 5.85 mSv and lung
absorbed dose of 22.58 mGy align well with established ICRP reference ranges, validating the methodology and
correction approach. This provides a reliable educational baseline with clear
potential for refinement in future patient-specific studies.
Keywords: ¹⁸F-FDG; PET/CT; Monte Carlo
simulation; Open GATE; patient-specific dosimetry; effective dose; dose-volume
histogram; voxelized phantom; lung dosimetry